Are java getters thread-safe?
Is is okay to synchronize all methods which mutate the state of an object, but not synchronize anything which is atomic? In this case, just returning a field?Consider:public class A{ private int a = 5;...
View ArticleAnswer by NESPowerGlove for Are java getters thread-safe?
It's not thread safe because that getter does not ensure that a thread will see the latest value, as the value may be stale. Having the getter be synchronized ensures that any thread calling the getter...
View ArticleAnswer by Gray for Are java getters thread-safe?
Is is okay to synchronize all methods which mutate the state of an object, but not synchronize anything which is atomic? In this case, just returning a field?Depends on the particulars. It is important...
View ArticleAnswer by gexicide for Are java getters thread-safe?
You basically have two options:1) Make your int volatile2) Use an atomic type like AtomicIntusing a normal int without synchronization is not thread safe at all.
View ArticleAnswer by Brett Okken for Are java getters thread-safe?
Your best solution is to use an AtomicInteger, they were basically designed for exactly this use case.If this is more of a theoretical "could this be done question", I think something like the...
View ArticleAnswer by Stephen C for Are java getters thread-safe?
The short answer is your example will be thread-safe, if the variable is declared as volatile, orthe getter is declared as synchronized.The reason that your example class A is not thread-safe is that...
View Article
/pic9814888.png)
/fit-in/580x348/filters:format(webp)/english-betterindia/media/media_files/2026/09/17/balaghat-3-2026-09-17-18-46-40.png)